|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Connecticut Drug Testing and Workers' Comp Laws
Connecticut Workers' Compensation Laws and Regulations Official Connecticut Website |
|||
|
|
CONNECTICUT State Law Summary - Workplace Drug/Alcohol Testing
[Editor: The information below consists of highlights and is not intended to be all-inclusive.]
GENERAL COMMENTS: This is a "HYBRID" with both required testing of certain job and mandatory rules for any employer conducting drug or alcohol testing within the state.
POLICY: NOT specified; MUST give applicant written notice at the time of application of the employer's intent to conduct a drug test.
NOTICE: Written notice to applicant of intent to test, otherwise no other notices/posting specified.
COSTS: Not specified.
CONSEQUENCES: MUST confirm all initial screen results.
WHO: Applies to any employee/applicant drug/alcohol test within the state, EXCEPT federally mandated tests. Does NOT apply to public employers.
WHAT: Does not specify or limit substances to be tested.
WHERE: All testing MUST be performed at an approved lab; screening method must be scientifically reliable.
WHEN: Permitted tests include:
1. Applicants: MUST inform the applicant of intent to test.
2. Reasonable suspicion of being under the influence which adversely affects or could adversely affect such employee's job performance.
3. Random: Safety-sensitive or High Risk jobs may be tested IF approved by the state Labor Commissioner High Risk/Safety Sensitive positions are defined as occupations which:
-
Presents a clearly significant life threatening danger to the employee so occupied, his fellow employees, or the general public and is performed in a manner or place inherent with or inseparable from such danger, and
-
Requires the exercise of discriminating judgment or high degree of care and caution, and
-
Is separate from the ability to discern impaired or enhanced performance by direct supervision and is not reasonably subject to other valid and available means of observation and evaluation which would preclude the necessity of random urinalysis.
For a list of approved positions go to:
http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/wgwkstnd/highrisk.htm. The site
states "This list may serve only as a guide for the Commissioner in future
investigations and determinations made pursuant to the regulations.
"Employers may institute random urinalysis drug testing only after their
individual request has received written approval from the Commissioner."
4. EAP: A test is permitted if the urinalysis is conducted as part of an employee assistance program sponsored or authorized by the employer in which the employee voluntarily participates.
HOW: All tests must be conducted utilizing "reliable methodology" and "such positive test result [are] confirmed by a second urinalysis drug test, which was separate and independent from the initial test, utilizing a gas chromatography and mass spectrometry methodology or a methodology which has been determined by the Commissioner of Public Health to be as reliable or more reliable than the gas chromatography and mass spectrometry methodology."
● NO direct observed collections allowed.
OTHER STATE PECULIARITIES:
-
Collective Bargaining Agreements must comply with the law.
-
Certain job functions MAY be tested per federal DOT rules. (Commercial drivers of vehicles under 26,001lbs but more than 10,001lbs, forklift operators, mechanics, school bus drivers).( Sec. 14-276a).
-
Requires testing individuals intended to operate school bus. (Sec. 14-276a).
-
Unemployment: Sec. 31-236. Disqualifications includes * * * if it is found by the administrator that he has been discharged or suspended because he has been disqualified under state or federal law from performing the work for which he was hired as a result of a drug or alcohol testing program mandated by and conducted in accordance with such law, until such individual has earned at least ten times his benefit rate.
-
Workers Comp: * * * compensation shall not be paid when the personal injury has been caused by the willful and serious misconduct of the injured employee or by his intoxication. (§ 31-284)
The material on this page has been provided by our resource partner
Park-Dickens Group,
distributor of FIGHTREADY™, an automated process for state specific,
post-accident policies and procedures to help defend against workers'
comp claims involving drug and alcohol intoxication. For a copy of the state
laws, regulations, statutes, court decisions, or cases involved,
email Bill Judge. |
WARNING: This information is presented after a review of the statutes, regulations and court decisions in this state. This information is subject to frequent change and inherently involves our opinion in certain instances and you may disagree. This information is presented for general educational purposes only -- IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE LEGAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. Always consult your legal and medical professionals before making any decisions.
NOTE: The material below was last updated in 2010. For a copy of the statutes or cases involved, email Bill Judge.
CONNECTICUT State Drug Testing Laws
Connecticut (Mandatory State)
Sec. 31-51t Drug Testing Definitions
For the purposes of sections
31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive: (1) "Employee" means any
individual currently employed or formerly employed and currently
being rehired by the same employer within twelve months of
terminating his employment, and includes any individual in a
managerial position; (2) "Employer" means any individual,
corporation, partnership or un incorporated association,
excluding the state or any political subdivision thereof; (3)
"Prospective employee" means any individual applying for
employment with an employer, other than an individual who
terminated his employment with such employer within twelve
months prior to such application.
Sec. 31-51u. Drug testing: Requirements.
(a) No employer may determine an
employee's eligibility for promotion, additional compensation,
transfer, termination, disciplinary or other adverse personnel
action solely on the basis of a positive urinalysis drug test
result unless (1) the employer has given the employee a
urinalysis drug test, utilizing a reliable methodology, which
produced a positive result and (2) such positive test result was
confirmed by a second urinalysis drug test, which was separate
and independent from the initial test, utilizing a gas
chromatography and mass spectrometry methodology or a
methodology which has been determined by the Commissioner of
Public Health to be as reliable or more reliable than the gas
chromatography and mass spectrometry methodology. (b) No person
performing a urinalysis drug test pursuant to subsection (a) of
this section shall report, transmit or disclose any positive
test result of any test performed in accordance with subdivision
(1) of subsection (a) of this section unless such test result
has been confirmed in accordance with subdivision (2) of said
subsection (a).
Sec. 31-51v. Drug testing: Prospective employees.
No employer may require a
prospective employee to submit to a urinalysis drug test as part
of the application procedure for employment with such employer
unless (1) the prospective employee is informed in writing at
the time of application of the employer's intent to conduct such
a drug test, (2) such test is conducted in accordance with the
requirements of subdivisions (1) and (2) of subsection (a) of
section 31-51u and (3) the prospective employee is given a copy
of any positive urinalysis drug test result. The results of any
such test shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed by
the employer or its employees to any person other than any such
employee to whom such disclosure is necessary.
Sec. 31-51w. Drug testing: Observation prohibited.
Privacy of results. (a) No employer or employer representative, agent or designee engaged in a urinalysis drug testing program shall directly observe an employee or prospective employee in the process of producing the urine specimen. (b) Any results of urinalysis drug tests conducted by or on behalf of an employer shall be maintained along with other employee medical records and shall be subject to the privacy protections provided for in sections 31-128a to 31-128h, inclusive. Such results shall be inadmissible in any criminal proceeding.
Sec. 31-51x. Drug testing: Reasonable suspicion required.
Random tests. (a) No employer may
require an employee to submit to a urinalysis drug test unless
the employer has reasonable suspicion that the employee is under
the influence of drugs or alcohol which adversely affects or
could adversely affect such employee's job performance. The
Labor Commissioner shall adopt regulations in accordance with
chapter 54 to specify circumstances which shall be presumed to
give rise to an employer having such a reasonable suspicion,
provided nothing in such regulations shall preclude an employer
from citing other circumstances as giving rise to such a
reasonable suspicion. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of
subsection (a) of this section, an employer may require an
employee to submit to a urinalysis drug test on a random basis
if (1) such test is authorized under federal law, (2) the
employee serves in an occupation which has been designated as a
high-risk or safety-sensitive occupation pursuant to regulations
adopted by the Labor Commissioner pursuant to chapter 54, or (3)
the urinalysis is conducted as part of an employee assistance
program sponsored or authorized by the employer in which the
employee voluntarily participates.
Sec. 31-51y. Drug testing: Medical screenings, regulation of employees and testing of gaming participants permitted.
(a) Nothing in sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, shall prevent an employer from conducting medical screenings, with the express written consent of the employees, to monitor exposure to toxic or other unhealthy substances in the workplace or in the performance of their job responsibilities. Any such screenings or tests shall be limited to the specific substances expressly identified in the employee consent form. (b) Nothing in sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, shall restrict an employer's ability to prohibit the use of intoxicating substances during work hours or restrict an employer's ability to discipline an employee for being under the influence of intoxicating substances during work hours. (c) Nothing in sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, shall restrict or prevent a urinalysis drug test program conducted under the supervision of the Division of Special Revenue within the Department of Revenue Services relative to jai alai players, jai alai court judges, jockeys, harness drivers or stewards participating in activities upon which pari-mutuel wagering is authorized under chapter 226.
Sec. 31-51z. Drug testing: Enforcement.
Damages. (a) Any aggrieved person may enforce the provisions of sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, by means of a civil action. Any employer, laboratory or medical facility that violates any provision of sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, or who aids in the violation of any provision of said sections shall be liable to the person aggrieved for special and general damages, together with attorney's fees and costs. (b) Any employer, laboratory or medical facility that commits, or proposes to commit, an act in violation of any provision of sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, may be enjoined therefrom by any court of competent jurisdiction. An action for injunctive relief under this subsection may be brought by any aggrieved person, by the Attorney General or by any person or entity which will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the protected class.
Sec. 31-51aa. Drug testing: Effect of collective bargaining agreement.
No provision of any collective bargaining agreement may contravene or supersede any provision of sections 31-51t to 31-51aa, inclusive, so as to infringe the privacy rights of any employee.
Sec. 31-51bb. Right of employee to pursue cause of action.
No employee shall be denied the right to pursue, in a court of competent jurisdiction, a cause of action arising under the state or federal constitution or under a state statute solely because the employee is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Nothing in this section shall be construed to give an employee the right to pursue a cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction for breach of any provision of a collective bargaining agreement or other claims dependent upon the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement.
As a result Nabors is justified in determining whether the Luedtkes are possibly impaired on the job by drug usage off the job. There four branches of common law right to privacy. See supra. However only Intrusion upon Seclusion branch contended have been violated this case.
For more information about how to reduce your Workers' Compensation costs, send us an e-mail, or simply submit this short form.
"Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%"
|
To learn more about how to lower your workers compensation expense, read the guidebook from Advisen and the Workers Comp Resource Center, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%, which covers the following:
|
| Recommend | ||||||||||||
| Follow Us | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| YouTube | Blog RSS | |||||||||||
| Share | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||












